Alfred R. Mele. (2005). A Critique of Pereboom’s ‘Four-Case Argument’ for Incompatibilism. Analysis, 65(1), 75–80. https://go.openathens.net/redirector/reading.ac.uk?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/3329340?pq-origsite=summon&seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
Alfred R. Mele and David Robb. (1998). Rescuing Frankfurt-Style Cases. The Philosophical Review, 107(1), 97–112. https://go.openathens.net/redirector/reading.ac.uk?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/2998316?pq-origsite=summon&seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
Aune, B., & Lehrer, K. (1982). 'Cans and Ifs: an Exchange’. In Free will: Vol. Oxford readings in philosophy. Oxford University Press.
Austin, J. L. (1979). ‘A plea for Excuses’. In J. O. Urmson & G. J. Warnock. (Eds.), Philosophical papers (3rd ed). Oxford University Press. https://go.openathens.net/redirector/reading.ac.uk?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/019283021X.001.0001
Ayer, J. (1982). ‘Freedom and Necessity’. In Free will: Vol. Oxford readings in philosophy. Oxford University Press.
Beebee, H. (2008). Smilansky’s alleged refutation of compatibilism. Analysis (Oxford), 68(3), 258–260. https://go.openathens.net/redirector/reading.ac.uk?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/25597892
Berofsky, B. (2002). Ifs, Cans, and Free Will: The Issues. In The Oxford handbook of free will. Oxford University Press. https://go.openathens.net/redirector/reading.ac.uk?url=http://www.oxfordhandbooks.com/view/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195178548.001.0001/oxfordhb-9780195178548-e-8
Berofsky, B. (2011). ‘Ifs, Cans, and Free Will: The Isssues’. In The Oxford handbook of free will: Vol. Oxford handbooks (2nd ed). Oxford University Press. https://go.openathens.net/redirector/reading.ac.uk?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195399691.001.0001
Bilgrami, A. (2012a). Self-knowledge and resentment (First Harvard University Press paperback edition). Harvard University Press.
Bilgrami, A. (2012b). Self-knowledge and resentment (First Harvard University Press paperback edition). Harvard University Press.
Boxer, K. E. (2013). Rethinking responsibility. Oxford University Press. https://go.openathens.net/redirector/reading.ac.uk?url=https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199695324.001.0001
Carl Ginet. (1996). In Defense of the Principle of Alternative Possibilities: Why I Don’t Find Frankfurt’s Argument Convincing. Philosophical Perspectives, 10, 403–417. https://go.openathens.net/redirector/reading.ac.uk?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/2216254?pq-origsite=summon&seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
Chisholm, R. M. (2003). ‘Human Freedom and the Self’. In Free will: Vol. Oxford readings in philosophy (2nd ed). Oxford University Press.
Clarke, R. (n.d.). Incompatibilist (Nondeterministic) Theories of Free Will. Stanford Encyclopaedia of Philosophy. http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/incompatibilism-theories/
Clarke, R. (2003). ‘Toward a Credible Agent-Causal Account of Free Will’. In Free will: Vol. Oxford readings in philosophy (2nd ed). Oxford University Press.
Clarke, Randolph. (n.d.). Incompatibilist (Nondeterministic) Theories of Free Will. Stanford Encyclopaedia of Philosophy. http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/incompatibilism-theories/
Corrado, M. L. (1994). Justification and excuse in the criminal law: a collection of essays: Vol. Garland studies in applied ethics. Garland Publishing.
Darwall, S. L. (2006). The second-person standpoint: morality, respect, and accountability. Harvard University Press.
David Widerker. (2000). Frankfurt’s Attack on the Principle of Alternative                            Possibilities: A Further Look. Philosophical Perspectives, 14, 181–201. https://go.openathens.net/redirector/reading.ac.uk?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/2676128?pq-origsite=summon&seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
Dennett, D. C. (1984). Elbow room: the varieties of free will worth wanting. Clarendon Press.
Derk Pereboom. (2000). Alternative Possibilities and Causal                            Histories. Philosophical Perspectives, 14, 119–137. https://go.openathens.net/redirector/reading.ac.uk?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/2676125?pq-origsite=summon&seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
Douglas Husak. (2005). On the Supposed Priority of Justification to Excuse. Law and Philosophy, 24(6), 557–594. https://go.openathens.net/redirector/reading.ac.uk?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/30040364?pq-origsite=summon
Duff, R. A. (2011). ‘What Kind of Responsibility Must Criminal Law Presuppose?’ [Electronic resource]. In Free will and modern science: Vol. British Academy original paperbacks. Oxford University Press. https://go.openathens.net/redirector/reading.ac.uk?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.5871/bacad/9780197264898.001.0001
Edited by Robert Kane. (n.d.-a). Bernstein Fatalism. In The Oxford Handbook of Free Will. http://www.oxfordhandbooks.com.idpproxy.reading.ac.uk/view/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195178548.001.0001/oxfordhb-9780195178548-e-3
Edited by Robert Kane. (n.d.-b). Haji Compatibilist Views of Freedom and Responsibility. In The Oxford Handbook of Free Will. http://www.oxfordhandbooks.com.idpproxy.reading.ac.uk/view/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195178548.001.0001/oxfordhb-9780195178548-e-9
Edited by Robert Kane. (n.d.-c). Introduction: The Contours of Contemporary Free Will Debates. In The Oxford Handbook of Free Will. https://go.openathens.net/redirector/reading.ac.uk?url=http://www.oxfordhandbooks.com/view/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195178548.001.0001/oxfordhb-9780195178548-e-1
Edited by Robert Kane. (n.d.-d). Widerker Responsibility and Frankfurt-type Examples. In The Oxford Handbook of Free Will. http://www.oxfordhandbooks.com.idpproxy.reading.ac.uk/view/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195178548.001.0001/oxfordhb-9780195178548-e-14
Ekstrom, L. W. (2000). Free will: a philosophical study: Vol. Focus series. Cumnor Hill.
Ekstrom, L. W. (2002). Libertarianism and Frankfurt-style Cases. In The Oxford handbook of free will. Oxford University Press. https://go.openathens.net/redirector/reading.ac.uk?url=http://www.oxfordhandbooks.com/view/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195178548.001.0001/oxfordhb-9780195178548-e-13
Eshleman, A. (n.d.). Moral Responsibility. Stanford Encyclopaedia of Philosophy,. http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/moral-responsibility/
Feinberg, J. (1968). ‘Action and Responsibility’. In The Philosophy of action: Vol. Oxford readings in philosophy (pp. 95–119). Oxford University Press.
Finch, A. (1998). The Mind argument and libertarianism. Mind, 107(427), 515–528. https://go.openathens.net/redirector/reading.ac.uk?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/2660112
Fischer, J. M. (2007). Four views on free will: Vol. Great debates in philosophy. Blackwell Pub. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/reading/detail.action?docID=306543
Fischer, J. M. (2008). My way: essays on moral responsibility (pp. 63–83). Oxford University Press. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/reading/detail.action?docID=272358
Fischer, J. M., & Ravizza, M. (2000). Responsibility and control: a theory of moral responsibility: Vol. Cambridge studies in philosophy and law. Cambridge University Press. https://go.openathens.net/redirector/reading.ac.uk?url=https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511814594
Fisher, J. M. (2003). ‘Frankfurt-Style Compatibilism’. In Free will: Vol. Oxford readings in philosophy (2nd ed). Oxford University Press.
Frankfurt, H. (2003a). ‘Alternate Possibilities and Moral Responsibility’. In Free will: Vol. Oxford readings in philosophy (2nd ed). Oxford University Press.
Frankfurt, H. (2003b). ‘Freedom of the Will and the Concept of a Person’. In Free will: Vol. Oxford readings in philosophy (2nd ed). Oxford University Press.
Gardner, J. (2007a). Offences and defences: selected essays in the philosophy of criminal law. Oxford University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199239351.001.0001
Gardner, J. (2007b). The Gist of Excuses. In Offences and defences: selected essays in the philosophy of criminal law (pp. 121–140). Oxford University Press. https://go.openathens.net/redirector/reading.ac.uk?url=https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199239351.001.0001
Hart, H. L. A., & Gardner, J. (2008). Punishment and responsibility: essays in the philosophy of law (2nd ed). Oxford University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199534777.001.0001
Helen Beebee. (2002). Reply to Huemer on the Consequence Argument. The Philosophical Review, 111(2), 235–241. https://go.openathens.net/redirector/reading.ac.uk?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/3182620?pq-origsite=summon
Honderich, T. (2011). ‘Determinism as true, both compatibilism and incompatibilism as false, and the real problem’. In The Oxford handbook of free will: Vol. Oxford handbooks (2nd ed). Oxford University Press. https://go.openathens.net/redirector/reading.ac.uk?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195399691.001.0001
Horder, J. (1996). Criminal Law: Between Determinism, Liberalism, and Criminal Justice. Current Legal Problems, 49(1), 159–186. https://doi.org/10.1093/clp/49.1.159
Horder, J. (2004). Excusing crime. Oxford University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199225781.001.0001
Huemer, M. (2000). Van Inwagen’s consequence argument. The Philosophical Review, 109(4), 525–544. https://go.openathens.net/redirector/reading.ac.uk?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/2693623
Inwagen, P. van. (2003). ‘An Argument for Incompatibilism’. In Free will: Vol. Oxford readings in philosophy (2nd ed). Oxford University Press.
John Martin Fischer. (1986). Van Inwagen on Free Will. The Philosophical Quarterly (1950-), 36(143), 252–260. https://go.openathens.net/redirector/reading.ac.uk?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/2219772?pq-origsite=summon&seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
Kane, R. (2002). The Oxford handbook of free will. Oxford University Press. http://idpproxy.reading.ac.uk/login?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195178548.001.0001
Kane, R. (2003). ‘Responsibility, Luck, and Chance: Reflections on Free Will and Indeterminism’. In Free will: Vol. Oxford readings in philosophy (2nd ed). Oxford University Press.
Kane, R. (2005). A contemporary introduction to free will: Vol. Fundamentals of philosophy series. Oxford University Press. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/reading/detail.action?docID=4963976
Kane, R. (2011). ‘Introduction: The Contours of Contemporary Free Will Debates’. In The Oxford handbook of free will: Vol. Oxford handbooks (2nd ed). Oxford University Press. https://go.openathens.net/redirector/reading.ac.uk?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195399691.001.0001
Kapitan, T. (2002). A Master Argument for Incompatibilism? In The Oxford handbook of free will. Oxford University Press. https://go.openathens.net/redirector/reading.ac.uk?url=http://www.oxfordhandbooks.com/view/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195178548.001.0001/oxfordhb-9780195178548-e-6
Kapitan, T. (2011). ‘A Master Argument for Incompatibilism?’ In The Oxford handbook of free will: Vol. Oxford handbooks (2nd ed). Oxford University Press. https://go.openathens.net/redirector/reading.ac.uk?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195399691.001.0001
L. Ekstrom. (2003). Free Will, Chance, and Mystery. Philosophical Studies: An International Journal for Philosophy in the Analytic Tradition, 113(2), 153–180. https://go.openathens.net/redirector/reading.ac.uk?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/4321354?pq-origsite=summon
Lewis, D. (2003). ‘Are We Free to Break the Laws?’ In Free will: Vol. Oxford readings in philosophy (2nd ed). Oxford University Press.
McKenna, M. (n.d.). Compatibilism. Stanford Encyclopaedia of Philosophy. http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/compatibilism/
Nagel, T. (1982). ‘Moral luck’. In Free will: Vol. Oxford readings in philosophy. Oxford University Press.
Nagel, T. (2003). ‘Freedom’. In Free will: Vol. Oxford readings in philosophy (2nd ed). Oxford University Press.
Nagel, Thomas. (1970). The possibility of altruism. Princeton University Press.
Nahmias, E. (2008). ‘Is incompatibilism intuitive?’,. In Experimental philosophy. Oxford University Press. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/reading/reader.action?docID=415292&ppg=94
Nichols, S., & Knobe, J. (2008). ‘Moral responsibility and Determinism: The Cognitive Science of Folk Intuitions’. In Experimental philosophy. Oxford University Press. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/reading/reader.action?docID=415292&ppg=118
O’Connor, T. (n.d.). Free Will. Stanford Encyclopaedia of Philosophy. http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/freewill/
O’Connor, T. (2002a). Libertarian Views: Dualist and Agent-Causal Theories. In The Oxford handbook of free will. Oxford University Press. https://go.openathens.net/redirector/reading.ac.uk?url=http://www.oxfordhandbooks.com/view/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195178548.001.0001/oxfordhb-9780195178548-e-15
O’Connor, T. (2002b). Persons & causes: the metaphysics of free will. Oxford University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/019515374X.001.0001
Online reading lists: a guide for students. (n.d.). University of Reading Library. http://libguides.reading.ac.uk/reading-lists/students
Ormerod, D., Laird, K., Gibson, M., Ormerod, D., & Smith, J. C. (2024). Smith, Hogan, and Ormerod’s criminal law (Seventeenth edition). Oxford University Press. https://go.openathens.net/redirector/reading.ac.uk?url=https://doi.org/10.1093/he/9780198890942.001.0001
Owens, D. (2012). Shaping the normative landscape. Oxford University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199691500.001.0001
Pereboom, D. (2001a). Living without free will: Vol. Cambridge studies in philosophy. Cambridge University Press. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/reading/detail.action?docID=201440
Pereboom, D. (2001b). Living without free will: Vol. Cambridge studies in philosophy. Cambridge University Press. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/reading/detail.action?docID=201440
Peter van Inwagen. (1978). Ability and Responsibility. The Philosophical Review, 87(2), 201–224. https://go.openathens.net/redirector/reading.ac.uk?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/2184752?pq-origsite=summon&seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
Peter van Inwagen. (2000). Free Will Remains a Mystery: The Eighth Philosophical Perspectives Lecture. Philosophical Perspectives, 14, 1–19. https://go.openathens.net/redirector/reading.ac.uk?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/2676119
Pryor, J. (n.d.). ‘Reading a Philosophy Paper’. http://www.jimpryor.net/teaching/guidelines/reading.html
Raz, J. (1986). The morality of freedom. Clarendon Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/0198248075.001.0001
Scanlon, T. (1998). What we owe to each other. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press. http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/reading/detail.action?docID=6233995
Smart, J. J. C. (2003). ‘Free Will, Praise and Blame’. In Free will: Vol. Oxford readings in philosophy (2nd ed). Oxford University Press.
Smilansky, S. (2000). Free will and illusion. Clarendon Press.
Strawson, G. (2002). The Bounds of Freedom. In The Oxford handbook of free will. Oxford University Press. https://go.openathens.net/redirector/reading.ac.uk?url=http://www.oxfordhandbooks.com/view/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195178548.001.0001/oxfordhb-9780195178548-e-19
Strawson, G. (2003). ‘The Impossibility of Moral Responsibility’. In Free will: Vol. Oxford readings in philosophy (2nd ed). Oxford University Press.
Strawson, G. (2010). Freedom and belief (Rev. ed). Oxford University Press. https://go.openathens.net/redirector/reading.ac.uk?url=https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199247493.001.0001
Strawson, P. (2003a). ‘Freedom and Resentment’. In Free will: Vol. Oxford readings in philosophy (2nd ed). Oxford University Press.
Strawson, P. (2003b). ‘Freedom and Resentment’. In Free will: Vol. Oxford readings in philosophy (2nd ed). Oxford University Press.
Tadros, V. (2005). Criminal responsibility: Vol. Oxford monographs on criminal law and justice. Oxford University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199225828.001.0001
Van Inwagen, P. (1983a). An essay on free will. Clarendon Press.
Van Inwagen, P. (1983b). An essay on free will. Clarendon Press.
Vargas, M. (2004). ‘Libertarianism and Skepticism about Free Will: Some Arguments against Both’. Philosophical Topics, 32(1), 403–426. https://go.openathens.net/redirector/reading.ac.uk?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/43154445
Velleman, J. D. (2015). Epistemic Freedom. In The possibility of practical reason (Second, pp. 46–72). Michigan Publishing.
Vihvelin, K. (n.d.). Arguments for Incompatibilism. Stanford Encyclopaedia of Philosophy,. http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/incompatibilism-arguments/
Wallace, R. J. (1994). Responsibility and the moral sentiments. Harvard University Press.
Wallace, R. J. (2006). Normativity and the will: selected papers on moral psychology and practical reason. Clarendon Press. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/reading/detail.action?docID=422953
Watson, G. (2003a). ‘Free Agency’. In Free will: Vol. Oxford readings in philosophy (2nd ed). Oxford University Press.
Watson, G. (2003b). Free will: Vol. Oxford readings in philosophy (2nd ed). Oxford University Press.
Watson, G. (2003c). ‘Introduction’. In Free will: Vol. Oxford readings in philosophy (2nd ed). Oxford University Press.
Watson, G. (2004). Agency and answerability: selected essays. Clarendon Press. http://idpproxy.reading.ac.uk/login?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199272273.001.0001
Widerker, D. (2003). ‘Libertarianism and Frankfurt’s Attack on the Principle of Alternative Possibilities’. In Free will: Vol. Oxford readings in philosophy (2nd ed). Oxford University Press.
Widerker, D., & McKenna, M. (2006). Moral responsibility and alternative possibilities: essays on the importance of alternative possibilities. Ashgate.
Wiggins, D. (2003). ‘Towards a Reasonable Libertarianism’. In Free will: Vol. Oxford readings in philosophy (2nd ed). Oxford University Press.
Williams, B. A. O. (1993). Shame and necessity: Vol. Sather classical lectures. University of California Press.
Wolf, S. (2003). ‘Sanity and the Metaphysics of Responsibility’. In Free will: Vol. Oxford readings in philosophy (2nd ed). Oxford University Press.