1.
Online reading lists: a guide for students [Internet]. University of Reading Library; Available from: http://libguides.reading.ac.uk/reading-lists/students
2.
Pryor J. ‘Reading a Philosophy Paper’ [Internet]. Available from: http://www.jimpryor.net/teaching/guidelines/reading.html
3.
Edited by Robert Kane. Introduction: The Contours of Contemporary Free Will Debates. The Oxford Handbook of Free Will [Internet]. Available from: https://go.openathens.net/redirector/reading.ac.uk?url=http://www.oxfordhandbooks.com/view/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195178548.001.0001/oxfordhb-9780195178548-e-1
4.
Kane R. A contemporary introduction to free will [Internet]. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2005. Available from: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/reading/detail.action?docID=4963976
5.
Kane R. The Oxford handbook of free will [Internet]. New York: Oxford University Press; 2002. Available from: http://idpproxy.reading.ac.uk/login?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195178548.001.0001
6.
Edited by Robert Kane. Bernstein Fatalism. The Oxford Handbook of Free Will [Internet]. Available from: http://www.oxfordhandbooks.com.idpproxy.reading.ac.uk/view/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195178548.001.0001/oxfordhb-9780195178548-e-3
7.
Berofsky B. Ifs, Cans, and Free Will: The Issues. The Oxford handbook of free will [Internet]. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2002. Available from: https://go.openathens.net/redirector/reading.ac.uk?url=http://www.oxfordhandbooks.com/view/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195178548.001.0001/oxfordhb-9780195178548-e-8
8.
Kapitan T. A Master Argument for Incompatibilism? The Oxford handbook of free will [Internet]. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2002. Available from: https://go.openathens.net/redirector/reading.ac.uk?url=http://www.oxfordhandbooks.com/view/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195178548.001.0001/oxfordhb-9780195178548-e-6
9.
O’Connor T. Libertarian Views: Dualist and Agent-Causal Theories. The Oxford handbook of free will [Internet]. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2002. Available from: https://go.openathens.net/redirector/reading.ac.uk?url=http://www.oxfordhandbooks.com/view/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195178548.001.0001/oxfordhb-9780195178548-e-15
10.
Strawson G. The Bounds of Freedom. The Oxford handbook of free will [Internet]. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2002. Available from: https://go.openathens.net/redirector/reading.ac.uk?url=http://www.oxfordhandbooks.com/view/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195178548.001.0001/oxfordhb-9780195178548-e-19
11.
Ekstrom LW. Libertarianism and Frankfurt-style Cases. The Oxford handbook of free will [Internet]. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2002. Available from: https://go.openathens.net/redirector/reading.ac.uk?url=http://www.oxfordhandbooks.com/view/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195178548.001.0001/oxfordhb-9780195178548-e-13
12.
Edited by Robert Kane. Widerker Responsibility and Frankfurt-type Examples. The Oxford Handbook of Free Will [Internet]. Available from: http://www.oxfordhandbooks.com.idpproxy.reading.ac.uk/view/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195178548.001.0001/oxfordhb-9780195178548-e-14
13.
Edited by Robert Kane. Haji Compatibilist Views of Freedom and Responsibility. The Oxford Handbook of Free Will [Internet]. Available from: http://www.oxfordhandbooks.com.idpproxy.reading.ac.uk/view/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195178548.001.0001/oxfordhb-9780195178548-e-9
14.
Watson G. Free will. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2003.
15.
Fischer JM. Four views on free will [Internet]. Malden, MA: Blackwell Pub; 2007. Available from: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/reading/detail.action?docID=306543
16.
O’Connor T. Free Will. Stanford Encyclopaedia of Philosophy [Internet]. Available from: http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/freewill/
17.
Watson G. ‘Introduction’. Free will. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2003.
18.
Kane R. ‘Introduction: The Contours of Contemporary Free Will Debates’. The Oxford handbook of free will [Internet]. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2011. Available from: https://go.openathens.net/redirector/reading.ac.uk?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195399691.001.0001
19.
Peter van Inwagen. Free Will Remains a Mystery: The Eighth Philosophical Perspectives Lecture. Philosophical Perspectives [Internet]. 2000;14:1–19. Available from: https://go.openathens.net/redirector/reading.ac.uk?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/2676119
20.
McKenna M. Compatibilism. Stanford Encyclopaedia of Philosophy [Internet]. Available from: http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/compatibilism/
21.
Ayer J. ‘Freedom and Necessity’. Free will. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1982.
22.
Aune B, Lehrer K. 'Cans and Ifs: an Exchange’. Free will. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1982.
23.
Smart JJC. ‘Free Will, Praise and Blame’. Free will. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2003.
24.
Dennett DC. Elbow room: the varieties of free will worth wanting. Oxford: Clarendon Press; 1984.
25.
Berofsky B. ‘Ifs, Cans, and Free Will: The Isssues’. The Oxford handbook of free will [Internet]. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2011. Available from: https://go.openathens.net/redirector/reading.ac.uk?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195399691.001.0001
26.
Vihvelin K. Arguments for Incompatibilism. Stanford Encyclopaedia of Philosophy, [Internet]. Available from: http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/incompatibilism-arguments/
27.
Van Inwagen P. An essay on free will. Oxford: Clarendon Press; 1983.
28.
John Martin Fischer. Van Inwagen on Free Will. The Philosophical Quarterly (1950-) [Internet]. 1986;36(143):252–260. Available from: https://go.openathens.net/redirector/reading.ac.uk?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/2219772?pq-origsite=summon&seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
29.
Lewis D. ‘Are We Free to Break the Laws?’ Free will. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2003.
30.
Kapitan T. ‘A Master Argument for Incompatibilism?’ The Oxford handbook of free will [Internet]. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2011. Available from: https://go.openathens.net/redirector/reading.ac.uk?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195399691.001.0001
31.
Huemer M. Van Inwagen’s consequence argument. The Philosophical review [Internet]. 2000 Oct;109(4):525–544. Available from: https://go.openathens.net/redirector/reading.ac.uk?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/2693623
32.
Helen Beebee. Reply to Huemer on the Consequence Argument. The Philosophical Review [Internet]. 2002;111(2):235–241. Available from: https://go.openathens.net/redirector/reading.ac.uk?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/3182620?pq-origsite=summon
33.
Nahmias E. ‘Is incompatibilism intuitive?’,. Experimental philosophy [Internet]. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2008. Available from: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/reading/reader.action?docID=415292&ppg=94
34.
Nichols S, Knobe J. ‘Moral responsibility and Determinism: The Cognitive Science of Folk Intuitions’. Experimental philosophy [Internet]. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2008. Available from: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/reading/reader.action?docID=415292&ppg=118
35.
Inwagen P van. ‘An Argument for Incompatibilism’. Free will. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2003.
36.
Clarke, Randolph. Incompatibilist (Nondeterministic) Theories of Free Will. Stanford Encyclopaedia of Philosophy [Internet]. Available from: http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/incompatibilism-theories/
37.
Wiggins D. ‘Towards a Reasonable Libertarianism’. Free will. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2003.
38.
Ekstrom LW. Free will: a philosophical study. Boulder, Colo: Cumnor Hill; 2000.
39.
L. Ekstrom. Free Will, Chance, and Mystery. Philosophical Studies: An International Journal for Philosophy in the Analytic Tradition [Internet]. 2003;113(2):153–180. Available from: https://go.openathens.net/redirector/reading.ac.uk?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/4321354?pq-origsite=summon
40.
Finch A. The Mind argument and libertarianism. Mind [Internet]. 1998 Jul;107(427):515–528. Available from: https://go.openathens.net/redirector/reading.ac.uk?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/2660112
41.
Van Inwagen P. An essay on free will. Oxford: Clarendon Press; 1983.
42.
Honderich T. ‘Determinism as true, both compatibilism and incompatibilism as false, and the real problem’. The Oxford handbook of free will [Internet]. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2011. Available from: https://go.openathens.net/redirector/reading.ac.uk?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195399691.001.0001
43.
Nagel T. ‘Moral luck’. Free will. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1982.
44.
Clarke R. Incompatibilist (Nondeterministic) Theories of Free Will. Stanford Encyclopaedia of Philosophy [Internet]. Available from: http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/incompatibilism-theories/
45.
Chisholm RM. ‘Human Freedom and the Self’. Free will. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2003.
46.
Clarke R. ‘Toward a Credible Agent-Causal Account of Free Will’. Free will. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2003.
47.
O’Connor T. Persons & causes: the metaphysics of free will [Internet]. New York: Oxford University Press; 2002. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/019515374X.001.0001
48.
Kane R. ‘Responsibility, Luck, and Chance: Reflections on Free Will and Indeterminism’. Free will. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2003.
49.
Strawson G. Freedom and belief [Internet]. Rev. ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2010. Available from: https://go.openathens.net/redirector/reading.ac.uk?url=https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199247493.001.0001
50.
Vargas M. ‘Libertarianism and Skepticism about Free Will: Some Arguments against Both’. Philosophical Topics [Internet]. 2004;32(1):403–426. Available from: https://go.openathens.net/redirector/reading.ac.uk?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/43154445
51.
Smilansky S. Free will and illusion. Oxford: Clarendon Press; 2000.
52.
Pereboom D. Living without free will [Internet]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2001. Available from: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/reading/detail.action?docID=201440
53.
Nagel T. ‘Freedom’. Free will. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2003.
54.
Duff RA. ‘What Kind of Responsibility Must Criminal Law Presuppose?’ Free will and modern science [Internet]. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2011. Available from: https://go.openathens.net/redirector/reading.ac.uk?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.5871/bacad/9780197264898.001.0001
55.
Strawson G. ‘The Impossibility of Moral Responsibility’. Free will. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2003.
56.
Frankfurt H. ‘Alternate Possibilities and Moral Responsibility’. Free will. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2003.
57.
Widerker D. ‘Libertarianism and Frankfurt’s Attack on the Principle of Alternative Possibilities’. Free will. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2003.
58.
Fisher JM. ‘Frankfurt-Style Compatibilism’. Free will. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2003.
59.
Alfred R. Mele and David Robb. Rescuing Frankfurt-Style Cases. The Philosophical Review [Internet]. 1998;107(1):97–112. Available from: https://go.openathens.net/redirector/reading.ac.uk?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/2998316?pq-origsite=summon&seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
60.
David Widerker. Frankfurt’s Attack on the Principle of Alternative Possibilities: A Further Look. Philosophical Perspectives [Internet]. 2000;14:181–201. Available from: https://go.openathens.net/redirector/reading.ac.uk?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/2676128?pq-origsite=summon&seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
61.
Widerker D, McKenna M. Moral responsibility and alternative possibilities: essays on the importance of alternative possibilities. Aldershot: Ashgate; 2006.
62.
Peter van Inwagen. Ability and Responsibility. The Philosophical Review [Internet]. 1978;87(2):201–224. Available from: https://go.openathens.net/redirector/reading.ac.uk?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/2184752?pq-origsite=summon&seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
63.
Derk Pereboom. Alternative Possibilities and Causal Histories. Philosophical Perspectives [Internet]. 2000;14:119–137. Available from: https://go.openathens.net/redirector/reading.ac.uk?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/2676125?pq-origsite=summon&seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
64.
Carl Ginet. In Defense of the Principle of Alternative Possibilities: Why I Don’t Find Frankfurt’s Argument Convincing. Philosophical Perspectives [Internet]. 1996;10:403–417. Available from: https://go.openathens.net/redirector/reading.ac.uk?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/2216254?pq-origsite=summon&seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
65.
Fischer JM, Ravizza M. Responsibility and control: a theory of moral responsibility [Internet]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2000. Available from: https://go.openathens.net/redirector/reading.ac.uk?url=https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511814594
66.
Fischer JM. My way: essays on moral responsibility [Internet]. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2008. p. 63–83. Available from: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/reading/detail.action?docID=272358
67.
Frankfurt H. ‘Freedom of the Will and the Concept of a Person’. Free will. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2003.
68.
Alfred R. Mele. A Critique of Pereboom’s ‘Four-Case Argument’ for Incompatibilism. Analysis [Internet]. 2005;65(1):75–80. Available from: https://go.openathens.net/redirector/reading.ac.uk?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/3329340?pq-origsite=summon&seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
69.
Pereboom D. Living without free will [Internet]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2001. Available from: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/reading/detail.action?docID=201440
70.
Watson G. ‘Free Agency’. Free will. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2003.
71.
Wolf S. ‘Sanity and the Metaphysics of Responsibility’. Free will. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2003.
72.
Beebee H. Smilansky’s alleged refutation of compatibilism. Analysis (Oxford) [Internet]. 2008;68(3):258–260. Available from: https://go.openathens.net/redirector/reading.ac.uk?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/25597892
73.
Strawson P. ‘Freedom and Resentment’. Free will. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2003.
74.
Eshleman A. Moral Responsibility. Stanford Encyclopaedia of Philosophy, [Internet]. Available from: http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/moral-responsibility/
75.
Wallace RJ. Responsibility and the moral sentiments. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press; 1994.
76.
Watson G. Agency and answerability: selected essays [Internet]. Oxford: Clarendon Press; 2004. Available from: http://idpproxy.reading.ac.uk/login?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199272273.001.0001
77.
Bilgrami A. Self-knowledge and resentment. First Harvard University Press paperback edition. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press; 2012.
78.
Austin JL. ‘A plea for Excuses’. In: J. O. Urmson, G. J. Warnock., editors. Philosophical papers [Internet]. 3rd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1979. Available from: https://go.openathens.net/redirector/reading.ac.uk?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/019283021X.001.0001
79.
Bilgrami A. Self-knowledge and resentment. First Harvard University Press paperback edition. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press; 2012.
80.
Boxer KE. Rethinking responsibility [Internet]. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2013. Available from: https://go.openathens.net/redirector/reading.ac.uk?url=https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199695324.001.0001
81.
Raz J. The morality of freedom [Internet]. Oxford: Clarendon Press; 1986. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/0198248075.001.0001
82.
Strawson P. ‘Freedom and Resentment’. Free will. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2003.
83.
Williams BAO. Shame and necessity. Berkeley: University of California Press; 1993.
84.
Hart HLA, Gardner J. Punishment and responsibility: essays in the philosophy of law [Internet]. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2008. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199534777.001.0001
85.
Nagel, Thomas. The possibility of altruism. Princeton, N.J: Princeton University Press; 1970.
86.
Wallace RJ. Normativity and the will: selected papers on moral psychology and practical reason [Internet]. Oxford: Clarendon Press; 2006. Available from: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/reading/detail.action?docID=422953
87.
Owens D. Shaping the normative landscape [Internet]. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2012. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199691500.001.0001
88.
Scanlon T. What we owe to each other [Internet]. Cambridge, Mass: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press; 1998. Available from: http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/reading/detail.action?docID=6233995
89.
Velleman JD. Epistemic Freedom. The possibility of practical reason. Second. Ann Arbor, Michigan.: Michigan Publishing; 2015. p. 46–72.
90.
Darwall SL. The second-person standpoint: morality, respect, and accountability. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press; 2006.
91.
Feinberg J. ‘Action and Responsibility’. The Philosophy of action. London: Oxford University Press; 1968. p. 95–119.
92.
Ormerod D, Laird K, Gibson M, Ormerod D, Smith JC. Smith, Hogan, and Ormerod’s criminal law [Internet]. Seventeenth edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2024. Available from: https://go.openathens.net/redirector/reading.ac.uk?url=https://doi.org/10.1093/he/9780198890942.001.0001
93.
Douglas Husak. On the Supposed Priority of Justification to Excuse. Law and Philosophy [Internet]. 2005;24(6):557–594. Available from: https://go.openathens.net/redirector/reading.ac.uk?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/30040364?pq-origsite=summon
94.
Corrado ML. Justification and excuse in the criminal law: a collection of essays. New York: Garland Publishing; 1994.
95.
Gardner J. The Gist of Excuses. Offences and defences: selected essays in the philosophy of criminal law [Internet]. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2007. p. 121–140. Available from: https://go.openathens.net/redirector/reading.ac.uk?url=https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199239351.001.0001
96.
Horder J. Criminal Law: Between Determinism, Liberalism, and Criminal Justice. Current Legal Problems. 1996 Jan 1;49(1):159–186.
97.
Tadros V. Criminal responsibility [Internet]. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2005. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199225828.001.0001
98.
Gardner J. Offences and defences: selected essays in the philosophy of criminal law [Internet]. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2007. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199239351.001.0001
99.
Horder J. Excusing crime [Internet]. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2004. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199225781.001.0001
